474-Management of Change / 748
Mana
g
e
m
ent of C
h
an
g
e
BOS-PRD-06.900701
Version 04. Original date: 24/05/2012. Version date: 31/12/2014. Valid version only on QMS site. Uncontrolled document when printed.
Procedure prepared by: BOS QHSES Manager. Approved by: BOS Managing Director. Validated by: BOS Quality Representative.
16 / 21
4
.
8
.
7
D
o
cum
entat
i
on
Documentation to be released as per list provided in
Completed New Built Vessel Handover Protocol
.
4
.
9
C
h
an
g
e of ve
ss
el o
p
e
r
at
i
n
g
c
on
d
i
t
i
on
s
This procedure highlights what needs to be achieved in order to ensure the change in operating condition (or
maintenance/inspection routines) does not compromise safety or increase risk to the environment or asset.
The bulk of the work associated with these changes is risk assessment and understanding the full extent of
the reasoning behind the current limits. These changes can only be implemented when the control measures
are fully developed and implemented.
The
A
ppr
oval A
u
t
h
o
ri
ty
for vessels change of operating conditions
should
be the
O
p
e
r
at
i
on
s
Mana
g
e
r
(can be delegated to the
Te
ch
n
ic
al Mana
g
e
r
as applicable). Prior to authorisation there
shall
be a record of
consultation with the
Ma
s
te
r
/C
hi
ef En
gi
nee
r
of all the vessel(s) affected.
The
C
h
an
g
e Coo
r
d
i
nato
r
shall
revisit the consultation process in the event that it is not possible to
implement the control measures prior to changing the procedure.
The change in operating conditions (or maintenance/inspection routine)
shall
undergo a trial period before
the
MoC form
can be filled out and the task formally closed.
4
.
9
.1 I
d
ent
i
f
ic
at
i
on of t
h
e nee
d
to
ch
an
g
e
The reason for the change are to be included in the
MoC Form
as this
shall
focus on the risk assessment
process. Examples of reasons include:
x
Main engine lubrication oil analysis indicates oil changes are too frequent;
x
Hydraulic power pack manufacturer has reduced recommended maintenance routine.
4
.
9
.
2
Ris
k a
ss
e
ssm
ent
Identify all stakeholders e.g.:
x
Equipment supplier;
x
Operational/Technical staff ashore;
x
Ma
s
te
r
;
x
C
hi
ef En
gi
nee
r
;
x
Other Departments affected;
x
Safety and Quality Management teams;
x
Client;
x
Bo
urb
on
Subs
ea Cont
r
a
c
t Mana
g
e
r
and
Bo
urb
on
Subs
ea H
S
E Mana
g
e
r
in case of MPSV.
Consult all stakeholders.
Assess the risks associated, including :
x
Risks to personnel safety and the environment;
x
Risk of catastrophic failure;
x
Risk of fire;
x
Effect on ship stability or watertight integrity;
x
Risk associated with change of demand on ship’s s
ervices such as electrical load;
x
Effect of changed procedure on ships programme
–
reducing frequency of stores delivery;
x
Effect of change on ships programme
–
reducing frequency of a mandatory maintenance routine
may increase vessel availability but then present problems regarding crew fatigue or scheduling
other maintenance.
x
Deficiency of training / familiarization to new operating conditions.
474