Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  501-Incident Reporting, Investigation and Management / 748 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 501-Incident Reporting, Investigation and Management / 748 Next Page
Page Background

Incident

R

e

p

ortin

g,

In

v

esti

g

ation

and Mana

g

e

m

ent

BOS-PRD-0302.900801

Version 04. Original date: 05/06/2012. Version date: 31/12/2014. Valid version only on QMS site.Uncontrolled document when printed.

Procedure prepared by: BOS QHSE Coordinators. Approved by: BOS QHSES Manager. Validated by: BOS Quality Representative

17 / 21

the Near Miss is also determined during this process.

A ‘

HIGH Near Miss

’

, said HiPo for High Potential,

requires Level 2 or higher investigation. The investigation, corrective and preventive action

shall

be carried

out as required by this procedure for the appropriate level.

A Near Miss incident is de

f

ined as Hi

g

h Potential

(

or

S

i

g

ni

f

icant

)

i

f

its se

v

erity

w

o

u

ld ha

v

e

b

een le

v

el

4 or hi

g

her accordin

g

to the se

v

erity

m

atri

x

in the section 3.5.1.

In all cases o

f

re

p

ortin

g

a near

m

iss

,

the e

mp

loyee

should

b

e thanked

f

or his/her

p

ositi

v

e actions.

4.5.5

T

he in

v

esti

g

ation re

p

ort

In the case of Level 1 incidents, the report form

shall

act as the investigation report with additional pages as

required.

Level 2 (and above) incident preliminary draft investigation reports

shall

be issued within 3 days of the

investigation being completed.

The final investigation report

shall

be issued within 10 days of the investigation being completed. If additional

time is required, this

shall

be justified and agreed by the

Mana

g

in

g

Director

.

The report

shall

contain the following:

x

Names and titles of the Investigation team;

x

A general summary of the incident;

x

Detailed description of the activity leading up to the incident;

x

Relevant information regarding the incident (personal information, experience, qualifications and

training of involved personnel, weather conditions, locations);

x

Compliance or failure of compliance analysis, detailing conformance and non-conformance with

regulations, policy, procedures, accepted safe working and best practices, availability and suitability

of equipment, technical systems;

x

Cause analysis including root and direct causal factors;

x

Recommended corrective action (immediate and long term as applicable);

Appendix (witness statements, log extracts, photographs, sketches etc.).

4.

6

C

orrecti

v

e and Pre

v

enti

v

e actions

4.

6

.1 Mana

g

e

m

ent actions

x

Company Management

shall

take responsibility to ensure that all corrective and preventive actions

are effectively identified and managed;

x

Shall

ensure that

‘Action Plans’ are prepared and approved

with responsibilities and close out dates

assigned;

x

Shall

ensure the effectiveness of actions are closed out and verified accordingly.

4.

6

.

2

L

ocation actions

x

Masters

and

Onshore Mana

g

ers

shall

take responsibility to ensure that all corrective and

preventive actions are effectively identified and managed at their location;

x

Implement and monitor corrective and preventive action for effectiveness with assistance of

management as required or requested;

x

Report the progress or closed out status of assigned actions at the location to management in a

clear and timely manner;

Ensure corrective and preventive actions are fully discussed at location safety meetings.

501