Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  103 / 266 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 103 / 266 Next Page
Page Background

103

2014 Registration Document

Corporate governance

3

Internal control

Each country executive director has established a formal annual self-

assessment process:

■

which uses standard tools that focus on existing frameworks and

are based on an internal-control risk analysis for each activity and on

identification of key control points;

■

the results of the internal-control self-assessment covering asset risks

are centralized periodically at Group Internal Audit level;

■

one of the Group Internal Audit department’s objectives in implementing

actions is the quantitative measurement, through scoring systems,

of the divergence between the self-assessment and the level of

internal control determined on the basis of its work. Monitoring these

divergences allows the quality of the country’s internal-control self-

assessment to be gauged.

Guidance and supervision of internal control entails internal country

controllers’ monitoring of action plans relating to the internal-control self-

assessment and risk mapping processes and of the recommendations of

the Group Internal Audit department. The results of the internal-control

self-assessment covering asset risks are centralized periodically at Group

Internal Audit level.

The final result of the supervision and guidance system is a letter of

affirmation on risk management and internal control signed by the

country executive director and the, confirming their appropriation of

and responsibility for internal control in terms of reporting and correcting

deficiencies.

Group general management supervises the internal-control and risk-

management system in particular through the minutes of meetings of

the following bodies and departments:

■

the Ethics Committee;

■

the Group Investment Committee;

■

the IT Request Management Committee;

■

Financial committees that guide the Group’s financial policy;

■

the Information Systems Governance department;

■

the Group Internal Audit department;

■

any other

ad hoc

committee meeting convened according to the needs

identified by general management.

Lastly, the performance of the internal-control supervision and guidance

system for accounting and financial risks is presented regularly to the

Accounts Committee.

3.6.1.2

Entities and individuals involved

in internal control and risk

management

◗

A.

At Group level

Group general management

is responsible for the internal-control and

risk-management systems. It is also tasked with designing, implementing

and supervising the internal-control and risk-management systems suited

to the size of the Group, its activity and its organization.

It initiates any corrective actions necessary to rectify an identified

malfunction and to maintain a situation within the limits of acceptable

risk. It ensures that these actions are successfully implemented.

General management performs its duties, in relation to the internal-control

and risk-management systems, which also include defining the roles and

responsibilities in that regard in the Group.

Group general management has created the following structure:

■

the

Group Finance department

is responsible for:

■

maintaining the reliability of financial and accounting information,

■

controlling accounting and financial risks,

■

measuring Group performance and budget control,

■

fofollowing Group investment procedure;

■

the

Group Legal department

is responsible for:

■

the governance policy for legal services,

■

establishing the governance policy of Group subsidiaries,

■

managing the Group’s legal risks;

■

the

Group Risks & Compliance department

is responsible for:

■

identifying, analysing, evaluating and treating risks within the Group

in support of the country executive directors,

■

company-wide risk prevention policy,

■

managing risks associated with the safety and security of property

and people,

■

leading the Groupe ethic system,

■

coordinating the Group crisis-management system;

■

the

Group Property department

is responsible for:

■

establishing the Group’s property policy,

■

managing risks relating to building security;

■

the G

roup Quality department

is responsible for:

■

establishing product quality, health and safety policy within the

Group,

■

managing product safety risks,

■

coordinating crisis management relating to product safety risks;

■

the

Group Human Resources department

is responsible for:

■

establishing human resources security policy within the Group,

■

coordinating social risk management;

■

the

Group Information Systems Governance department

is

responsible for:

■

establishing the information systems management policy within

the Group,

■

managing risks relating to the continuity, integrity, confidentiality

and security of information systems;

■

the

Group Insurance department

is responsible for setting up

insurance to cover the Group’s insurable assets as effectively as

possible and according to available capacity on the market, pursuant

to Group insurance policies. It works with the Risks & Compliance in

transferring of a portion of the risks to the insurance market.