Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  216 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 216 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

DANONE

REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2015

Corporate Governance

6.1 Governance bodies

216

Danone, within a Board of Directors that has a majority of inde-

pendent Directors as defined using the strictest application of

current standards. Moreover, the Board noted the absence of a

significant business relationship between Mr. Bruno BONNELL

and Danone based on the criteria presented above;

•

concerning Mr.

Benoît POTIER

, a Director for more than 12 years,

the Board has observed, in addition to the above explanation

regarding the Board of Directors' assessment of the 12-year

seniority criterion, the strong contribution to the Board's dis-

cussions by Mr. Benoît POTIER, Chairman and Chief Executive

Officer of Air Liquide, one of the largest CAC 40 companies, as

well as his ability to think and express himself freely. Mr. Benoît

POTIER also demonstrates a remarkable independence of mind.

Moreover, the Board noted the absence of a significant business

relationship between Mr. Benoît POTIER and Danone based on

the criteria presented above;

•

concerningMrs.

GaëlleOLIVIER

, the Board of Directors examined

her situation and, in particular, reviewed the financial transactions

between Danone and the Axa group, where Mrs. Gaëlle OLIVIER

is a senior executive. These financial transactions mainly cor-

respond to the payment by Danone of insurance premiums for

insurance policies covering property damage/operating losses

and civil liability as well as personal insurance policies. In any

case, for the 2015 fiscal year, the sums paid by Danone to the Axa

group were far less than 0.1% of the sales generated by either

Danone or the Axa group. In addition, this business relationship

existed long beforeMrs. Gaëlle OLIVIER's appointment as Director

and is not “materially” important for Axa. As a result, the Board

believed that, to the extent that these contracts or agreements

are concluded under market conditions in the normal course of

Danone's business and do not represent significant sums, none

of these contracts or agreements taken separately or together

is: (i) liable to give rise to conflicts of interest between, on the

one hand, Mrs. Gaëlle OLIVIER's duties towards Danone and its

shareholders in her capacity as Director and, on the other hand,

her private interests and/or other duties, and (ii) liable to impair

her independence as a Danone Director;

•

concerningMrs.

MounaSEPEHRI

, theBoard examinedher situation

given her functions at Renault. Thus, the Board analyzed whether

the presence of Mr. Franck RIBOUD on the Board of Directors of

Renault, a group in which Mrs. Mouna SEPEHRI performs man-

agement functions, could compromise Mrs. Mouna SEPEHRI's

independence. Pursuant to the rules of the AFEP-MEDEF Code,

the independence of a Director may be called into question only if

the Director is him/herself a corporate officer of Renault, which

is not the case (since Mrs. Mouna SEPEHRI is not a director of

Renault). The Board also reviewed the financial transactions

between Danone and the Renault group of which Mrs. Mouna

SEPEHRI is a senior executive. Renault is the supplier to the

company car leasing agencies used by Danone. The amounts

paid by Danone to the Renault group for fiscal year 2015 were

far less than 0.1% of the sales generated by either Danone or

the Renault group. In addition, this business relationship existed

long before Mrs. Mouna SEPEHRI's appointment as Director and

is not “materially” important for Renault. As a result, the Board

believed that, to the extent that these contracts are concluded

under market conditions in the normal course of Danone's

business and do not represent significant sums, none of these

contracts taken separately or together is: (i) liable to give rise

to conflicts of interest between, on the one hand, Mrs. Mouna

SEPEHRI's duties towards Danone and its shareholders in her

capacity as Director and, on the other hand, her private interests

and/or other duties, and (ii) liable to impair her independence

as a Danone Director;

•

concerning Mrs.

Serpil TIMURAY

,

the Board confirmed that

she meets all the AFEP-MEDEF Code independence criteria,

particularly as regards the absence of a business relationship

between Mrs. Serpil TIMURAY and Danone based on the criteria

presented above;

•

concerning Mr.

Lionel ZINSOU-DERLIN

, the Board believed that

the fact that he was an employee and senior executive of Danone

until 1997 does not call into question his qualification as an

independent Director. Indeed, the AFEP-MEDEF Code provides

that only those directors who were an employee or corporate

officer of the Company, of its parent company or of a company

that it consolidates over the five previous years be qualified as

non-independent. The Board therefore confirmed that Mr. Lionel

ZINSOU-DERLINmeets all the AFEP-MEDEF Code independence

criteria, including as regards the absence of a significant business

relationship between Mr. Lionel ZINSOU-DERLIN and Danone

based on the criteria presented above;

•

lastly, concerning Mrs.

Virginia A. STALLINGS

and Messieurs

Jacques-Antoine GRANJON

,

Jean LAURENT

et

Jean-Michel

SEVERINO

, the Board noted, in particular, the absence of a

business relationship between them and Danone and therefore

confirmed their qualification as independent Directors.