Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  217 / 364 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 217 / 364 Next Page
Page Background

DANONE

REGISTRATION DOCUMENT 2015

Corporate Governance

6.1 Governance bodies

217

In addition, in reviewing the proposed appointments as Directors,

the Board of Directors, at the recommendation of the Nomination

and Compensation Committee, examined the situation of Mrs. Clara

GAYMARD in light of the independence rules of the AFEP-MEDEF

Code. The Board concluded that Mrs. Clara GAYMARD should be

considered an independent Director, because she meets all the in-

dependence criteria of the AFEP-MEDEF Code applied by the Board.

The presentation of Mrs. Clara GAYMARD and the analysis of this

candidate's independence are given in the report of the Board of

Directors to the Shareholders' Meeting (see section 8.3

Comments

on the resolutions of the Shareholders' Meeting

).

In accordance with French Financial Markets Authority recommen-

dation No. 2012-02, the table hereafter presents the situation of

each Director with regard to the independence criteria defined by

the AFEP-MEDEF Code (situation as of February 22, 2016):

Name

Employee or

executive direc-

tor and officer

during the past

five years

(a)

Cross-

directorships

(a)

Significant

business

relationship

(a)

Family

relationship

(a)

Statutory

audit

(a)

Term of office

exceeding

12 years

(a) (b)

Franck RIBOUD

X

O

O

O

O

X

Emmanuel FABER

X

O

O

O

O

X

Bruno BONNELL

O

O

O

O

O

O

(b)

Jacques-Antoine GRANJON

O

O

O

O

O

O

Marie-Anne JOURDAIN

X

O

O

O

O

O

Jean LAURENT

O

O

O

O

O

O

Gaëlle OLIVIER

O

O

O

O

O

O

Benoît POTIER

O

O

O

O

O

O

(b)

Isabelle SEILLIER

O

O

X

O

O

O

Mouna SEPEHRI

O

O

O

O

O

O

Jean-Michel SEVERINO

O

O

O

O

O

O

Virginia A. STALLINGS

O

O

O

O

O

O

Bettina THEISSIG

X

O

O

O

O

O

Serpil TIMURAY

O

O

O

O

O

O

Lionel ZINSOU-DERLIN

O

O

O

O

O

O

(a) “O” represents an independence criterion that is met; “X” represents an independence criterion that is not met.

(b) Concerning the application of the criterion of a term of office exceeding 12 years, see section

Review of Directors' independence

above.

Conflicts of interest

To the Company's knowledge, there are no family ties among the

Company's corporate officers and, during the last five years, no

corporate officer has been convicted of fraud, declared bankruptcy,

been placed in receivership or liquidation, been officially and publicly

accused and/or penalized by any statutory or regulatory authority,

or been prohibited by a court from being a member of a company's

administrative, management or supervisory body or fromparticipat-

ing in the management or administration of a company's business.

To the Company's knowledge, there are no potential conflicts of in-

terest between any Director's duties to the Company and their private

interests and/or other duties, with the exception of Mrs. Isabelle

SEILLIER (see section

Review of Directors' independence

above).

At the date of the present Registration Document, no corporate

officer is connected to the Company or one of its subsidiaries via a

services contract granting any benefits whatsoever.

Training of Directors

Danone offers (i) each new Director an extensive integration pro-

cess that includes individual meetings with several Directors and

individual interviews with members of General Management and

the Executive Committee, and (ii) all Directors the opportunity to

attend presentations by senior managers in charge of Danone's

main functions as well as regular on-site visits.

For example, Mrs. Serpil TIMURAY, a Director appointed in 2015,

completed an integration program in 2015 that included several

individual interviews with members of General Management and

the Executive Committee and attended presentations by several

directors of Danone's main functions.

Moreover, in accordance with the Board's rules of procedure,

specific training was provided by an outside organization to each

of the Directors representing employees. In 2015, one of the two

Directors representing employees received this academic training.

In accordance with Decree No. 2015-606 of June 3, 2015, the

Directors representing employees were also consulted in order

to obtain their opinion regarding the training that they wished to

receive during the year.